Article
The concept of vision à la carte allows all ophthalmic surgeons to design vision for each patient individually, using all of today’s technologies and techniques.
Take-home
The concept of vision à la carte allows all ophthalmic surgeons to design vision for each patient individually, using all of today’s technologies and techniques.
Dr. Gulani
By Arun C. Gulani, MD
Jacksonville, FL-Vision à la carte is a concept I would like to share with all ophthalmic surgeons wherein we can design vision for each patient individually, using all of today’s technologies and techniques, including combinations of these.
The cornerstone of success is the surgeon’s ability to customize the approach to each patient’s vision goal or best vision potential.
How do we arrange these techniques and pick the ones most suitable for each patient?
My approach has always been that we eye surgeons are all vision-corrective surgeons (irrespective of cornea, LASIK, or cataract specialties).
In this armamentarium of vision-corrective surgery-think of it as an umbrella term with about 48 techniques-there are nearly nine different types of LASIK/laser vision surgery (10 now, with the recent SMILE technique I performed while abroad), four types of implantable contact lenses, six types of premium lens implants, seven types of corneal transplants, five types of intrastromal corneal ring segments, and about three ways of doing corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).
(figure 1) Vision a la carte allows all ophthalmic surgeons to design vision for each patient individually, using all of today's technologies and techniques. (Image courtesy of Arun C. Gulani, MD, and Eyemaginations)
With these approaches at our fingertips, we can try various combinations and have unlimited permutations to tailor to each patient’s vision goal. I introduced this concept of vision à la carte at the Bombay Ophthalmology Association’s conference, held in Mumbai, India, in August.
I like to teach this to surgeons and my patients as “Lego” pieces. Arrange these surgery techniques like Lego pieces on shelves in the mind. Each category should have its own color.
For example, all laser vision techniques could be blue, all cataract surgery lens implant choices and techniques yellow, all corneal techniques green, and adjunct techniques such as CXL (that can be used in combination with practically any surgery) white.
Now, say a surgeon is planning a combination of cataract surgery (yellow piece) with LASIK (blue piece). The surgeon now has a plan that can be visualized, and the colors can be used to explain the plan so much more easily. This approach also empowers the surgeon to pick whatever piece is best suited for the patient or even choose combinations.
Apply this concept to complex and complicated cases. For example, in the case of LASIK ectasia, the surgeon can plan for lamellar corneal transplant (a green piece), followed by laser PRK (a blue piece) 6 months later. This needs to be followed by CXL (a white piece).
Customization further involves the proper consideration of three factors that I call the 3Ts-target, technique, and technology.
The Gulani 5S Classification System algorithm sets the background to my approach and makes any simple or complex case scenario lucid enough to understand and effectively treat.
This algorithm involves classification according to sight, scar, shape, strength, and site (Figure 1).
Surgeons can address any virgin or complex case with a simplified understanding of the 5S system and a plan that not only surgeons and their patients can understand but they can e-mail this plan to their friends and families as well. (Eyemaginations is working with me toward developing this three-dimensional software prototype).
Today, with patient expectations, available technology options, and information resources, patients are literally coming in with their own vision goals, chosen technology, and researched techniques for the surgeon to perform.
With a global patient clientele in my practice, I am seeing patients every day who are willing to travel to a surgeon they have chosen, in their minds, to be the most capable to deliver their “individualized vision goal.”
This concept may serve to relieve surgeons of constantly being under the gun of oncoming technology promises coupled with prohibitive expenses and will not necessitate re-learning techniques and challenging their comfort zone.
Instead, this concept allows us to use all the surgical techniques we already have access to and are capable of performing and put them into a new perspective.
Additionally, this concept of planning with patients invigorates them to the fact that we are personalizing a plan in their best interests, and therefore, the “cost” issue becomes secondary, which otherwise is a confabulating tradeoff toward choice for patients.
Patients are moving from the “burgers-for-everyone” concept and are asking for à la carte treatments. Are we ready to offer a menu of vision-corrective options?
Suggested reading
Gulani AC. Femtosecond laser in cataract surgery: Designer cataract surgery. Textbook of Femtosecond Laser: Technology & Techniques. 1st ed. J.P. Publishers 2012;20:152-154.
Charters L. Classification system aimed at various corneal refractive surgery complications. Ophthalmology Times. http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/user/login/?destination=node/291988&nid=291988. Accessed Sept. 1, 2013.
Gulani AC. Corneoplastique. Video Journal of Ophthalmology. III. 2007
Gulani AC. Shaping the future and reshaping the past: The art of vision surgery. Chapter 98. In: Copeland and Afshari’s Principles and Practice of Cornea. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2013;2:1252-1573.
Subscribe to Ophthalmology Times to receive the latest clinical news and updates for ophthalmologists.