Video

Study compares postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry values versus total keratometry values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas

Author(s):

Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve.

The study, “Comparison of Keratometry vs. Total Keratometry with Multivariable Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Post-Myopic Laser Vision Correction Eyes," presented by Jacob Rogers in collaboration with the Dean McGee Eye Institute, is a retrospective review of 130 eyes with previous M-LVC that were measured with SS-OCT biometer for K and TK prior to cataract surgery between 2019-2021.

"At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values." - Jacob Rogers

Purpose of the study

  • To compare postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry (K) values versus total keratometry (TK) values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer (IOL Master 700) with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas
  • To assess whether TK values used with multivariable formulas help refractive accuracy in post M-LCV eyes, or whether using a formula dedicated for post M-LVC eyes with traditional K values yields improved refractive outcomes

Study conclusions

  • IOL calculation remains challenging in post-refractive eyes, as we continue to obtain refractive outcomes within +/-0.5D in only one half of eyes
  • Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve
  • At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values
  • Given the similarly positive outcomes, surgeons can utilize either K or TK values for the EVO-LVC and Barrett True K formulas

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Parag Majmudar, MD, on bridging the gap between residency and real-world practice
Brett Bielory, MD, discusses his poster at the ASCRS annual meeting, which focuses on an under-diagnosed corneal pathology: neurotrophic keratitis.
ASCRS 2025: Eva Kim, MD, discusses implantable collamer lenses and high myopia.
Abby Markward, MBA, and Hattie Hayes, editor of Ophthalmology Times Europe, discuss the ASCRS and ASOA meetings
Abby Markward discusses the ASCRS Foundation and the ASCRS Annual Meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Inside ASCRS 2025: Francis S. Mah, MD, takes the helm with a vision for research, education, and advocacy
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: Cranial nerve six palsy with chemosis is a critical clue to cavernous carotid fistula
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.