Publication

Article

Digital Edition

Ophthalmology Times: May 2021
Volume46
Issue 8

Snapshot: Managing endogenous endophthalmitis in patients

Author(s):

UK physician notes a full systemic work-up needed to determine source of infection.

Reviewed by Winfried M.K. Amoaku, PhD, MBChB, FRCS

Endophthalmitis is a rare occurrence in ocular surgery but the percentage, no matter how small, remains unacceptable. Winfried M.K. Amoaku, PhD, MBChB, FRCS, associate professor/reader in ophthalmology and Hon Consultant Ophthalmologist, University of Nottingham & Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, England, describes the management protocol followed in the United Kingdom to treat older patients with endogenous endophthalmitis.

The endogenous form of the infection is exceedingly rare, occurs in 1 per 1 million cases annually, and accounts for about 10% of all endophthalmitis.

Intraocular infection occurs as the result of hematogenous spread from a distant nonophthalmic source and may be bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral.

Related: Reducing post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis: Investigators focus on therapeutic regimen

Patients most likely (but not exclusively) to develop endogenous endophthalmitis are immunocompromised, and include those with diabetes, systemic cancer, and HIV and those taking antineoplastic therapies, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and immunomodulatory agents, he explained.

The presentation of the infection includes varying degrees of pain, inflammation, and visual loss. The clinical examination shows the presence of an anterior segment inflammation, vitreous opacification, choroidoretinal infiltrates, retinal hemorrhages, cotton-wool spots, and retinal vasculitis.

The progression of the infection depends on the causative organism. With a bacterial infection, rapid progression is expected, fungal infections progress slowly, and the speed of viral progression can vary.

Related: Preventing post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis

Diagnosis of endophthalmitis
Amoaku warned about the “fair degree” of misdiagnosis, which is as high as about 63%.

“A high degree of suspicion for endophthalmitis is needed to establish the diagnosis,” he cautioned. He also noted the importance of ruling out intraocular lymphoma, which mimics endogenous endophthalmitis.

Amoaku cited a 2018 report of the British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit1 that included 48 patients (median age, 56.9 years) from December 2013 to December 2014. About 46% of patients were older than 60, the oldest being 85.

The presenting features in these patients included cellulitis, afferent pupillary defect, corneal clarity, anterior chamber cells, hypopyon, fibrin, vitritis, retinitis, and others, which were similar to those reported in the literature.

“Typically, in these patients the endophthalmitis was unilateral and included bacterial, viral, and fungal infections,” he said.

Related: Study identifies link between endophthalmitis, coronavirus

Upon presentation, the vision was already poor, with a median of 3 logarithms of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA).

Several infection sources identified in addition to the strong association with diabetes included septic arthritis, colon cancer, cardiac valve disease, and intravenous drug use, among others.

The blood cultures were positive in 58% of patients; in contrast, vitreous biopsies were positive in only about 23%. The causative organism was more likely to be identified in patients who presented early after the onset of symptoms.

Treatment included a combination of systemic intravenous or oral antibiotics, intravitreal antibiotics, antifungal drugs, and mostly topical steroids.

Related: Research: Similar endophthalmitis rates for generic, branded topical antibiotics

A total of 25 patients, including 1 who died, were followed for 6 months. The median visual acuity was 0.18 logMAR; the VA was below 1.0 in 4 of 23 patients and below 0.3 in 19 patients. Poor outcomes were characterized by no light perception and light perception VA.

UK treatment recommendations: systemic and ocular
“A full systemic workup is necessary to determine the source of the infection and a high degree of suspicion is required,” he said. “The mandatory examinations include ophthalmic ultrasound and intraocular biopsy of the vitreous for microscopy, culturing and sensitivity, and blood cultures. Cardiac echography, abdominal ultrasound, and MRI are indicated as appropriate.”

Importantly, Amoaku noted that diabetes must be excluded in all cases.

The intraocular treatment begins based on the clinical features and presumed diagnosis. After the vitreous biopsy results are received, treatment is modified as needed.

Intravitreal therapy includes vancomycin 1 mg/0.1 ml plus amikacin 0.4 mg/0.1 ml or ceftazidime 1 mg/0.1 ml for bacterial infections and amphotericin B for fungal infections. Ganciclovir is prescribed for viral infections.

Related: Endophthalmitis detection by whole genome sequencing and qPCR

Three to 5 days after the initial treatment, the treatment is repeated depending on the diagnosis and the response. Vitrectomy is reserved to treat a few selected cases.

Amoaku emphasized that the systemic anti-infective treatment specific to the infectious agent is mandatory for all cases. When the infection is under control, systemic steroids can be started.

--

Winfried M.K. Amoaku, PhD, MBChB, FRCS
e:wma@nottingham.ac.uk
This article is adapted from Amoaku’s presentation at the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s 2020 virtual annual meeting. Amoaku has no financial interest in this subject matter.

--

Reference
1. Maling S, King C, Davies N. A British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit study on metastatic endogenous endophthalmitis. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(4):743-748.
doi:10.1038/eye.2017.284

Related Videos
AAO 2024: Matt Giegengack, MD: Injectable endothelial cell therapy shows promise for improving vision and reducing glare in corneal edema
EyeCon 2024: Adam Wenick, MD, talks about myopic interventions across the lifespan
Adam Wenick, MD, chairs EyeCon session: New treatments in geographic atrophy from detection to intervention
EyeCon 2024: Laura M. Periman, MD, shares her passion for dry eye disease, discussing her surprising discovery of the Alpenglow Sign in Demodex blepharitis
David Eichenbaum, MD, presents advances in AMD therapy, highlights different mechanisms with a common goal
Cochair Kelly K. Nichols, OD, PhD, MPH, FAAO, highlights her passion for dry eye research and the vital collaboration between ophthalmology and optometry
EyeCon 2024: Peter J. McDonnell, MD, marvels on mentoring, modern technology, and ophthalmology’s future
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.