Article

Seeking 'root cause' of post-LASIK symptoms

San Francisco—Capt. Steven Schallhorn, MD, addressed two timely issues at the annual San Francisco Cornea, Cataract, and Refractive Surgery Symposium. The first was the effect of pupil size on visual symptoms after LASIK and the second, custom-guided PRK procedures related to visual results and improved quality of vision.

San Francisco-Capt. Steven Schallhorn, MD, addressed two timely issues at the annual San Francisco Cornea, Cataract, and Refractive Surgery Symposium. The first was the effect of pupil size on visual symptoms after LASIK and the second, custom-guided PRK procedures related to visual results and improved quality of vision.

Regarding pupil size, the process of reducing a patient's sphere and cylinder during LASIK also commonly increases higher-order aberrations.

"This is probably the root cause of why some patients have symptoms after LASIK," said Dr. Schallhorn, director of cornea and refractive surgery, Naval Medical Center, San Diego. "A patient can attain 20/20 uncorrected vision afterward but complains about the quality of his or her vision. This has led to numerous discussions of the role the pupil size plays in visual disturbances.

In clinical practice, he pointed out, there are issues related to the pupil, but there are no standard methods to measure the low-light pupil diameter. Many factors such as medications, stress, and accommodation can influence the pupil size, yet there is no consistent method to control them during pupil measurement. In addition, the true scotopic pupil diameter is not relevant to the lighting conditions (mesopic range) under which patients have visual symptoms.

To determine the role of the pupil in predicting which patients will develop visual symptoms after refractive surgery, Dr. Schallhorn and colleagues conducted a study that evaluated conventional LASIK using several different lasers in 442 patients (884 eyes).

The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent was–3.61 D (range, –1.13 to –11.25 D), 1 month postoperatively 0.02 D, and 6 months postoperatively –0.08 D. One and 6 months postoperatively, 83% and 79%, respectively, achieved 20/20 uncorrected visual acuity, and 99% and 98% achieved 20/40 uncorrected visual acuity.

To determine the factors predictive of postoperative visual disturbances, multi-regression analyses evaluated age, gender, complaint, pupil diameter, pupil diameter minus the optical zone, contrast acuity, treatment parameters (sphere, cylinder, manifest spherical equivalent, and minor axis), and postoperative results (sphere, cylinder, manifest spherical equivalent, uncorrected visual acuity, and contrast acuity), he said.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: Cranial nerve six palsy with chemosis is a critical clue to cavernous carotid fistula
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Neda Shamie_Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) World Cornea Congress IX: Epi-on and accelerated crosslinking with Kenneth Beckman, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The synergy of cornea, cataract, and refractive surgery through the decades: insights from George O. Waring IV, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: A look at Gemini and the MIGS revolution with Mona Kaleem, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Development and evaluation of an AI model to set target IOP with Jithin Yohannan, MD, MPH
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.