Article

Scheimpflug device, ultrasound pachymetry both repeatable for CCT measurements

San Francisco-Both ultrasound pachymetry and a proprietary Scheimpflug imaging device (Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems) produced excellent repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements, and the repeatability was strong for both "virgin" and post-refractive eyes, according to Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS, assistant professor of ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

San Francisco-Both ultrasound pachymetry and a proprietary Scheimpflug imaging device (Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems) produced excellent repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements, and the repeatability was strong for both “virgin” and post-refractive eyes, according to Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS, assistant professor of ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

He presented data from a study of 77 eyes in 39 patients who were candidates for refractive surgery, and 39 eyes in 21 post-refractive surgery patients.

“Ultrasound pachymetry is considered the gold standard for CCT measurements, but it’s not without its problems,” Dr. Weikert said. “It requires the operator to place the probe directly in the center of the cornea, and there are other issues such as tissue compression. Scheimpflug imaging, on the other hand, is non-contact, repeatable, and can provide a measurement of a larger area of the cornea, not just the center.”

In this study, a single examiner made three consecutive measurements with each device in patients who had virgin corneas, postLASIK patients at least 3 months after surgery, and postPRK patients at least 6 months after surgery.

They found no statistically significant difference in the CCT measurements of virgin eyes taken with either instrument. In the post-refractive surgery patients, the mean corneal thickness as measured by the Scheimpflug device was 500.4 µm (± 44.8 µm), and it was 494.3 µm (± 50.3 µm) as measured by ultrasound pachymetry. The difference was small (–6.2 µm ± 9.9 µm) but statistically significant (p = 0.0004).

Dr. Weikert said both devices have high repeatability of measurements when used carefully by a single examiner. He added that the dual Scheimpflug instrument tended to measure thicker corneas in general.

Although he now uses it as the primary method for checking CCT before refractive surgery, other practitioners who choose to do so may wish to re-check thinner corneas with ultrasound pachymetry, Dr. Weikert concluded.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Neda Shamie_Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) World Cornea Congress IX: Epi-on and accelerated crosslinking with Kenneth Beckman, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The synergy of cornea, cataract, and refractive surgery through the decades: insights from George O. Waring IV, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: A look at Gemini and the MIGS revolution with Mona Kaleem, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Development and evaluation of an AI model to set target IOP with Jithin Yohannan, MD, MPH
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: The role of muscle biopsy in heteroplasmy detection
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.