Article

Lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty: last resort for ectasia after LASIK?

When other possible treatments for ectasia fail, lamellar keratoplasty (LK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) may be the last resort for these patients, said William Culbertson, MD.

When other possible treatments for ectasia fail, lamellar keratoplasty (LK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) may be the last resort for these patients, said William Culbertson, MD.

"Indications of this treatment are the inability to see adequately with glasses or rigid gas-permeable contact lenses or when other treatments fail, including collagen cross-linking," Dr. Culbertson said. "The goal is to make the patient visually functional again with either glasses or contact lenses."

The progression of treatments to follow, according to Dr. Culbertson, is first to confirm the progression of the ectasia; collagen cross-linking can be used in cases in which progression is occurring. Corneal implants (Intacs, Addition Technology), surface ablation, or both also can be considered.

In patients who require keratoplasty the routine preoperative evaluation includes documentation of the patient's vocation and avocation and determination of the patient's expectations and the ability to wear a contact lens postoperatively as well as the cause of the ectasia if possible, according to Dr. Culbertson. He is from Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami.

He also noted that the area of corneal steepening and the thickness of the residual stromal bed should be determined by slit-lamp examination or scanning technology.

"These factors are important for determining which keratoplasty technique to use," he said.

PK can be performed if the patient requires 20/20 vision and the period of visual rehabilitation is not critical; rehabilitation can take from 6 to 24 months. PK can also be performed in patients with a thin central cornea and a thick peripheral cornea in those patients not vulnerable to trauma. LK can be performed in patients who can function with 20/30 vision postoperatively and rapid rehabilitation time is important, Dr. Culbertson explained.

The final visual outcome with PK is unpredictable and high astigmatism often develops. The procedure carries a 5% risk of graft rejection. However, the final visual acuity can be good, but ranges from 20/20 to 20/40. With LK, despite the rapid visual rehabilitation, the increase in the refraction is minimal, there is irregular astigmatism and interface haze. There is no graft rejection with this procedure, but the final visual acuities can range from 20/30 and 20/25 at best.

Related Videos
Arun Gulani, MD: How the Gni instrument enhances precision and control in cataract surgery
EyeCon 2024: Peter J. McDonnell, MD, marvels on mentoring, modern technology, and ophthalmology’s future
EyeCon Co-chair Oluwatosin U. Smith, MD: Passion for Research and Education Drives Her Commitment to Ophthalmology
Dr. SriniVas Sadda Discusses Vision for ARVO as New President: Collaboration, Funding Challenges, and Impact of Annual Meetings
Highlights from the 18th Annual Controversies in Modern Eye Care Symposium: Arjan Hura, MD, on Refractive Surgery, Retina Care, and Record Attendance
ASCRS 2024: ViaLase Updates on Nonincisional Glaucoma Treatment Targeting Trabecular Meshwork
Dr. Neda Nikpoor Shares Practical Techniques to Combat Unconscious Gender Bias and Promote Gender Equality in Ophthalmology
ASCRS 2024: George O. Waring, MD, shares early clinical performance of bilateral Odyssey implantation
ASCRS 2024: Deborah Gess Ristvedt, DO, discusses third-generation trabecular micro-bypass
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.