Article

Exposures of porous orbital implants can be avoided

In the past decade, porous orbital implants have become the implant of choice for many surgeons managing the anophthalmic socket after enucleation or evisceration. By permitting fibrovascular ingrowth, these porous implants are better able to resist infection, migration, and extrusion when compared with acrylic or silicone implants.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Gregory Moloney, FRANZO, FRCSC, on rotational stability
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Steven J. Dell, MD, reports 24-month outcomes for shape-changing IOL
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Parag Majmudar, MD, on bridging the gap between residency and real-world practice
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Inside ASCRS 2025: Francis S. Mah, MD, takes the helm with a vision for research, education, and advocacy
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Neda Shamie_Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The synergy of cornea, cataract, and refractive surgery through the decades: insights from George O. Waring IV, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: A look at Gemini and the MIGS revolution with Mona Kaleem, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Constance Okeke, MD, highlights 1-year Streamline canaloplasty outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Two-year data of bio-interventional cyclodialysis with scleral allograft with Leon W. Herndon Jr, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Aqueous humor outflow improvement after excimer laser trabeculostomy with Clemens Strohmaier, PhD
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.