Article

Exposures of porous orbital implants can be avoided

In the past decade, porous orbital implants have become the implant of choice for many surgeons managing the anophthalmic socket after enucleation or evisceration. By permitting fibrovascular ingrowth, these porous implants are better able to resist infection, migration, and extrusion when compared with acrylic or silicone implants.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Constance Okeke, MD, highlights 1-year Streamline canaloplasty outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Two-year data of bio-interventional cyclodialysis with scleral allograft with Leon W. Herndon Jr, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Aqueous humor outflow improvement after excimer laser trabeculostomy with Clemens Strohmaier, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Thomas W. Samuelson, MD, shares clinical perspectives on DSLT, SLT, and glaucoma management
Image credit: Ophthalmology Times; Dean McGee Eye Institute resident Ashley Ooms, MD, explores gray area strabismus surgery complications in AUPO poster
Image credit: Ophthalmology Times; EnVision Summit 2025: Sonia H. Yoo, MD, shares what to expect from the cataract and refractive agenda
Image credit: ©Ophthalmology Times
Wendy Lee, MD, talks about functional oculoplastics and aesthetics at EnVision Summit 2025
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.