Article

Drug noninferior for AMD

Two studies of a fusion protein (VEGF Trap-Eye, Regeneron) showed that all doses of the drug, including those administered every 2 months, to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration were noninferior to ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) in the number of patients who maintained their visual acuity

Orlando-Two studies of a fusion protein (VEGF Trap-Eye, Regeneron) showed that all doses of the drug, including those administered every 2 months, to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were noninferior to ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) in the number of patients who maintained their visual acuity.

“When we deviate from the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug treatment regimens for treating neovascular AMD and treat less frequently, the outcomes are less robust compared with strict adherence to the treatment regimens,” said Jeffrey Heier, MD, of Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston. “We have an unmet medical need highlighted by the need to minimize treatment burden while maintaining treatment efficacy. Because of this, we anxiously awaited the results of the VIEW trials.”

The fusion protein blocks all isoforms of VEGF and placental growth factor.

VIEW 1, conducted in North America, and VIEW 2, conducted globally, were carried out simultaneously and included more than 2,400 patients who were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: VEGF Trap-Eye 0.5 mg monthly, 2 mg monthly, 2 mg every 2 months after receiving three initial monthly doses, or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab monthly. The primary endpoint was prevention of moderate vision loss at 1 year. In the second year of the study, the protocol calls for as-needed dosing to be administered with strict re-treatment criteria.

Dr. Heier said that the fusion protein was generally well tolerated and had a favorable safety profile for treating neovascular AMD.

“All groups of [the fusion protein] were noninferior compared with ranibizumab dosed monthly,” he said. “Regarding the mean improvement in the letter score, all four arms of the study were similar. The hope is to decrease the treatment burden for these patients and maintain excellent outcomes.”

For more articles in this issue of Ophthalmology Times Conference Brief click here.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Bonnie An Henderson, MD, on leveraging artificial intelligence in cataract refractive surgery
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Gregory Moloney, FRANZO, FRCSC, on rotational stability
Sheng Lim, MD, FRCOphth, discusses the CONCEPT study, which compared standalone cataract surgery to cataract surgery with ECP, at the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Steven J. Dell, MD, reports 24-month outcomes for shape-changing IOL
Alex Hacopian, MD, discusses a presbyopia-correcting IOL at the 2025 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ASCRS) annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Parag Majmudar, MD, on bridging the gap between residency and real-world practice
Brett Bielory, MD, discusses his poster at the ASCRS annual meeting, which focuses on an under-diagnosed corneal pathology: neurotrophic keratitis.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Oluwatosin U. Smith talks Glaukomtecken
ASCRS 2025: Eva Kim, MD, discusses implantable collamer lenses and high myopia.
Abby Markward, MBA, and Hattie Hayes, editor of Ophthalmology Times Europe, discuss the ASCRS and ASOA meetings
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.