Article

Allergan wins brimonidine patent infringement case

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has ruled in favor of Allergan Inc. in its patent infringement lawsuit against two sets of defendants seeking to market purported generic versions of the company?s formulations of brimonidine tartrate 0.1% and 0.15% (Alphagan P) for ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Specifically, the court ruled that Allergan's five patents related to the ophthalmic solutions are valid and enforceable.

Irvine, CA

-The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has ruled in favor of Allergan Inc. in its patent infringement lawsuit against two sets of defendants seeking to market purported generic versions of the company’s formulations of brimonidine tartrate 0.1% and 0.15% (Alphagan P) for ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Specifically, the court ruled that Allergan’s five patents related to the ophthalmic solutions are valid and enforceable.

“Innovation in medicine has improved lives, reduced suffering, and advanced the quality of patient care, and our intellectual property embodies our commitment to and investment in medical innovation,” said Douglas S. Ingram, Allergan’s executive vice president, chief administrative officer, and secretary. “It is only through a respect for intellectual property rights that the cost, time, and risk of failure associated with new innovations is justified. Accordingly, this case is a victory not merely for Allergan but for the research and development process that brings new treatment choices to the medical community.”

The companies named in the lawsuit, which was filed in 2007, were Exela PharmSci Inc. of Reston, VA; Exela PharmSci Pvt. Ltd. of Hyderabad, India; Apotex Inc. of Toronto; and Apotex Corp. of Weston, FL. The court ruled that Apotex’s proposed two generic brimonidine formations infringed on each of the five Allergan patents and that Exela’s proposed generic version of the 0.15% formulation infringed on the only patent asserted against it.

Under the terms of the Hatch-Waxman Act, the FDA is required to delay approval of defendants’ proposed generic products until the last infringed patent expires, which will occur in 2022.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: Cranial nerve six palsy with chemosis is a critical clue to cavernous carotid fistula
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Neda Shamie_Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) World Cornea Congress IX: Epi-on and accelerated crosslinking with Kenneth Beckman, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The synergy of cornea, cataract, and refractive surgery through the decades: insights from George O. Waring IV, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: A look at Gemini and the MIGS revolution with Mona Kaleem, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Development and evaluation of an AI model to set target IOP with Jithin Yohannan, MD, MPH
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.