News

Video

AAO 2024: Injectable endothelial cell therapy shows promise for improving vision and reducing glare in corneal edema

Key Takeaways

  • Injectable endothelial cell therapy improves visual acuity and glare in corneal edema, showing promise as an alternative to DMEK.
  • Clinical trials in El Salvador demonstrated consistent improvements in best-corrected visual acuity and brightness acuity testing over one year.
SHOW MORE

Matt Giegengack, MD, explains how injectable corneal endothelial cell therapy can enhance visual acuity and alleviate glare, offering a versatile alternative to current treatments like DMEK.

Injectable human corneal endothelial cell therapy shows promise in improving both visual acuity and glare associated with corneal edema, according to Matt Giegengack, MD, who presented findings from two clinical trials at the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2024 annual meeting, held October 18 to 21 in Chicago, Illinois.

Giegengack, a cornea specialist at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, discussed data from clinical trials in El Salvador, where patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and brightness acuity testing (BAT) over one year. The results indicated consistent improvements in both metrics, with BCVA and BAT advancing in parallel, suggesting that endothelial cell therapy effectively addresses not only visual acuity issues but also bothersome glare.

He explained that the lowered threshold for surgical intervention in corneal endothelial disease is often driven by glare, which is currently best treated with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While DMEK remains the gold standard for conditions like Fuchs dystrophy, Giegengack highlighted limitations in its applicability, particularly for patients with unstable lenses or certain glaucoma procedures. "Endothelial cell therapy is going to be a treatment that you can do on anybody that has corneal edema," he said, emphasizing the therapy’s potential to expand treatment options.

However, he acknowledged that some El Salvadorian patients presented with more severe disease and other ocular conditions that would have precluded DMEK, potentially confounding the results. To address these limitations, a US clinical trial is under way, focusing on patients with milder disease and fewer confounders. Giegengack expressed optimism that the US trial will validate the findings and further demonstrate the therapy’s versatility for treating all patients who currently undergo DMEK.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: A look at Gemini and the MIGS revolution with Mona Kaleem, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Development and evaluation of an AI model to set target IOP with Jithin Yohannan, MD, MPH
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: The role of muscle biopsy in heteroplasmy detection
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Achieving success as an academic ophthalmologist with Thomas V. Johnson III, MD, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Constance Okeke, MD, highlights 1-year Streamline canaloplasty outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Telemedicine and genetics for resource-efficient care with Louis R. Pasquale, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) AGS 2025: Two-year data of bio-interventional cyclodialysis with scleral allograft with Leon W. Herndon Jr, MD
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.