• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

Study compares postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry values versus total keratometry values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas

Video

Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve.

The study, “Comparison of Keratometry vs. Total Keratometry with Multivariable Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Post-Myopic Laser Vision Correction Eyes," presented by Jacob Rogers in collaboration with the Dean McGee Eye Institute, is a retrospective review of 130 eyes with previous M-LVC that were measured with SS-OCT biometer for K and TK prior to cataract surgery between 2019-2021.

"At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values." - Jacob Rogers

Purpose of the study

  • To compare postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry (K) values versus total keratometry (TK) values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer (IOL Master 700) with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas
  • To assess whether TK values used with multivariable formulas help refractive accuracy in post M-LCV eyes, or whether using a formula dedicated for post M-LVC eyes with traditional K values yields improved refractive outcomes

Study conclusions

  • IOL calculation remains challenging in post-refractive eyes, as we continue to obtain refractive outcomes within +/-0.5D in only one half of eyes
  • Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve
  • At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values
  • Given the similarly positive outcomes, surgeons can utilize either K or TK values for the EVO-LVC and Barrett True K formulas
Related Videos
Video 3 - "Approaching Asymptomatic Cases with Risk Factors"
Video 2 - "Do Dry Eye Diagnostics Change the Management of Dry Eye?"
Elias Kahan, MD, speaks at the 2024 ARVO meeting
Andrew Pucker, OD, PhD
Dr. SriniVas Sadda Discusses Vision for ARVO as New President: Collaboration, Funding Challenges, and Impact of Annual Meetings
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.